The latest on that, http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...syrian-jet/ar-BBCSZcj?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE07DHP .
This is a proxy war. Both puppeteers could be playing it up for the optics with no real intention of directly warring with one another. On the other hand, they could be playing it straight in which case, I feel certain, war is inevitable.
It doesn't sound good..."Any aircraft, including planes and drones belonging to the international coalition operating west of the Euphrates river, will be tracked by Russian anti-aircraft forces in the sky and on the ground and treated as targets," the Russian defence ministry said. I am not very experienced on war related matters, would Russia make empty threats? IDK.
Hard to say. I think we are kept from the truth by the media on almost everything. What are European papers saying?
I wouldn't plan your future, if any of us have one (in this world!), on what you'd read in European papers. I could be completely wrong, of course. I've given up on almost all of them for years. Maybe they've become much better since. The US should be very wary of going to war with a country with a far smaller economy, a much weaker conventional military, but a disproportionately large residual nuclear strike force. Desperation could easily provoke a first strike. I've said it before, but I can't help recalling the absence of references to the US in approved Catholic prophesy in the context of what appears to be a predicted grand European war.
AED, I happened to read the article that I posted which originated from the BBC immediately before I read Byron's post. The following is from FOX news, http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/06/19/us-shoot-down-syrian-jet-prompts-russian-threat.html Things are and have been tedious to say the least.
It sure looks that way. The anti-Trump brigade have put him in a position where any attempt at cooling the atmosphere will be seen as capitulation. The war mongers could get their wish.
I remember reading a year or two ago about a prophecy (possibly unapproved) that stated that WWIII would begin in late summer; no specific date. Does anyone else remember reading the same thing? If so, what's the prophecy?
Who knows what is going on behind the scenes really? But this is interesting; it would not surprise me in the least if it is quite true: https://gloria.tv/video/P98SGtTgTZoE3ekiY8V2o3Nyh
Me either padraig. I was speaking with my mother recently and mentioned to her that in our area which has been absolutely covered by so called chem trails in the sky the last several years that I noticed that they had stopped for some reason and had not been so prevalent as they have in the past since the beginning of the year. As a result the sky has been bluer than I can remember it in several years time. Really quite beautiful and amazing to see. Anyway, when I mentioned this she told me that she too had noticed this also. She lives quite some distance from us closer to the coast.
Lots of rosaries are always needed. No matter the situation. The lies we have been fed for the last 500 years will not prevail, nor will any of the powers that wish to unite the world under one world government. God destroyed the Tower of Babel and although we have those who desire to unite under one mantel it will not happen. He said so. Is the modern West and the most powerful of nations not mentioned? Maybe not by name like nations of the ME. After all, the entire world and its surrounding nations was centered there and we did not exist. Did Kings from China go to listen to Solomons wisdom? Men of all nations came to listen to Solomon’s wisdom, sent by all the kings of the world, who had heard of his wisdom. 1 Kings 4:34 Did Alexander come across the whole earth? As I was considering, suddenly a male goat came from the west, across the surface of the whole earth (Daniel 8:5) So, when considering the prophecy of the end times should we not consider that these same nations are the nations that were spoken of by the prophets in the end time? Should we interject ourselves into them? When Zechariah or Mathew state that all nations will be brought against Israel could it be that only the surrounding nations as in that day will be involved against his chosen? Daniel 11 tells of the antichrist making war against the strongest fortresses. Then, there are many versus which say that antichrist will be confronted. So this gives rise to wonder, would this mean that antichrist is not the strongest power like the ear ticklers have led us to believe? Who would be these strongest fortresses and is present in the ME? Can antichrist rule over the whole world and yet fight against the strongest fortresses as we are told? I read a lot of prohecy written by protestants over the years who took Gods word and twisted it to fit their narrative to sell books in the USA. None of them ever sat right after digesting them. I was always left with indigestion and thinking how can this be right? Nothing ever fit. These powers will even bring low the antichrist. Behold, therefore I will bring strangers upon thee, the terrible of the nations: and they shall draw their swords against the beauty of thy wisdom, and they shall defile thy brightness. They shall bring thee down to the pit, and thou shalt die the deaths of [them that are] slain in the midst of the seas. (Ezekiel 28:7-8) We have had many wolves in sheeps clothing who have published book after book making millions of dollars cashing in on the Christian of the west who wishes to understand prophecy and is led astray by ear ticklers. I am glad now that I was one of them. It further cements my Catholic faith.
I live on the Chesapeake Bay shore. There is a small naval facility up the road about 4-5 miles. Received an email today from Town Hall saying that for the next 3 days a small jet will be flying at 200-300 ft for testing. This facility requires a secret clearance. Just wondering
