Never mind, I think that I am thinking of that one picture in which the object appears to be in front of the sun and the fact that we keep referring to it as a second sun. But I think what they are saying is that it is behind our sun and could be getting lit up by our sun not producing it's own light. Sorry. PS- This may also be why we don't see it more, it needs to be illuminated by our sun to be visible. PPS- This object can do the darkening of the sky (and hopefully that is all) and God may still provide the light show that the various seers described.
This video is a bit long, but worth a listen. You will surely learn some valuable information about Nubiru and its ultimate coming. Starting at about the 37 minute mark he gives a good overview of Nubiru, as seen from the camera of a man flying in a jet and filming it upon the sun rise. At the 1:11 mark he goes through 'when we can see it with our own eye's and at the 1:21 mark he makes it clear that it "will be to late" when we can see it with our own eye's to prepare.
I did listen to most of this. It's from another source, entirely, but still credible. I am not big on ancient prophecies, and sometimes I get worried thinking something is too new-agey, but this seems to boil it down with diagrams. This man's calm demeanor almost made me want to strangle him through the tube get on with it, man!
Yea, he is a bit annoying and he is seeing things through a secular view, where his 5-10' dirt tunnel's will get him through the EMP. Well, I will stick with what got the 8 Jesuit priests through the worst nuclear event only blocks away from the center of the bomb at Hiroshima and that is praying the rosary daily or I will gladly die in God's grace.
Yes, Fatima, hear, hear, totally agree! The Rosary is the weapon we need, and the graces we need flow from it. It was truly remarkable and miraculous about those priests at ground zero of an atomic blast! When I was very young and in elementary school, my father was hospitalized at Washington Hospital Center in DC, which was a brand-new hospital back then. Ahem. Point is, youngsters under 12 were not allowed to visit on the patient floors, so I stayed in the lobby and looked at this extensive photo display which lined the walls, photos of the burn victims from the two blasts, and stories of the lingering problems they were having. It made such a deep and lasting impression me. It sickened me, as well. So we soldier on.
I just went back to the video since I skipped around while I was watching it the first time. I didn't realize that he explains all about the system (not just one object), I wonder where all of this information came from. I mean how do they know it's a brown dwarf with multiple planets and the planets have moons? This is a little over the top for me, we'll see.
Astronomers have been studying space for a long time, and they have noticed changes in gravitational pulls, increase in comets, blabla. I am not a scientist, but Hubble is taking photos of things, one is an object called Sedna that should not be there. Our Lady has said recently that God is the Creator of the cosmos and there is a lot more out there than we think. I read that recently, and it may have been in Pedro Regis. Or it may have been Gianna Talone Sullivan, here on the forum. The point is, God is in charge. The scientists are not. The scientists can tell if a body is a brown dwarf through infrared photography, but also they have classified stars according to "age" and color, color having something to do with temperature on the surface. As I said, the scientists get paid to do all of this, and have amassed a large body of knowledge. The question is, are they correct in saying that it is now time for the Nemesis solar system to come our way again? And I am not sure I swallow all of the theories and hypotheses that these bodies are responsible for what happened millions of years ago. I am not sure. What if the Bible is 100% correct that God made the Earth about 6 thousand years ago LITERALLY? (not figuratively, as in a day being a million years) I am almost to the point where I can believe in absolute Creationism.
Here's Marshall Masters' website. He's been around quite a while, one of the first to inform the public about this system among other things....like crop circles that seem to be giving current ongoing placements for these planets. He gives the history and ancient beliefs; survival advice et al. Some time ago he was some kind of science editor or reporter at CNN. http://yowusa.com
I believe it's Fr. Iannuzzi who has written that man came to being 6000 years ago....as human beings with souls. There could certainly be other pre-human types for ages prior to that event. The earth, cosmos, creation in general could certainly have been in existence for millions of years prior to that. And....we have hardly pierced the understanding of our own portion of the cosmos. We certainly can't even begin to utter what could even be possible for God beyond our experience within our own limited knowledge. Just think of the experience of Thomas Aquinas and his gifted brilliance, only to also have the opportunity to have just a bit of the veil lifted before him to realize how minute even his great gifts were in comparison. We speak of God's "unfathomable" Mercy, meaning not even the angels with all of their brilliant knowledge can understand it.
Children, God did not create only the Earth. God is the Creator of the cosmos, with its many galaxies, many orbits, different stars and different planets. God is the Creator! There are other planets like earth, far beyond your understanding. June 1, 2008.....OLOE to Gianna Sullivan.
I'll have to verify later, but Jesus told Anne Catherine Emmerich that the earth was created around six thousand years ago. He revealed that the pride of the Egyptians began the lies and false studies of the age of the earth.
Incoming Objects Increasing - A Sure Sign of Nibiru's Approach 10 September 2016 Another Previously Undiscovered Asteroid Just Buzzed Past Earth for the Second Time in Two Weeks Astronomers have discovered a new asteroid—just in time to catch it as it hurtled past us at less than a tenth of the distance between us and the moon. It’s the second time that’s happened in two weeks. Monster mile-wide asteroid to make dramatic ‘near Earth pass’ today, with another to whiz past next week A MASSIVE two kilometre-wide asteroid has made a dramatic “near Earth pass” today. ...Another rock named 2016QL44 has also been identified – and heading in our direction on “a highly uncertain orbit”. ...at just 61 metres in length, so it would likely not cause the apocalypse. However, if it was to crash into a city it would cause the same damage as several nuclear bombs. It is believed 2016 QL44 will also miss earth – predicted to whiz by at 60,000km/h in nine days’ time, on September 17. But scientists are keeping a close eye on it in case of a miscalculation or a change in course. The space rock was coded as a nine of NASA’s scale – meaning scientists are the least certain about its flight path. In 1908, a similar sized asteroid exploded above Siberia in what has now been dubbed The Tunguska Event. Meteor explodes in fiery blaze over Cyprus What appears to be a meteor burst across the nighttime sky in Cyprus early on Friday, flashing and thundering so powerfully overhead that the ground shook, according to reports from residents. A Cyprus Geological Department official, Iordanis Demetriades, said there's no indication that the object hit Earth. It probably "exploded in the sky," he said. Those living in the Troodos Mountain range said they saw green-white lights in the sky around 1 a.m., and then heard large blasts, according to police. http://nibiruiscoming.blogspot.com/2016/09/incoming-objects-increasing-sure-sign.html
We know with carbon dating this is not even close to true. Now it could be true the first humans with soles were from that time
The way I see it, there could be 3 possibilities: 1. The first humans with souls appeared 6,000 years ago (Adam and Eve--this would be compatible with evolution) 2. God created the universe in such a way that it appears it is much older than it actually is (but this seems deceptive) 3. Our radiocarbon dating is faulty. This is a position that I have begun to gravitate toward due to my interest in dinosaurs. I now find it implausible either that there were so few species over hundreds of millions of years, or that we have found evidence of so few species if there were so many more. Further, I have read interesting articles about fossils found with soft tissue in them, which would be impossible given the age our carbon dating gives us. Not to mention an article I remember as a kid that mentioned finding human and dinosaur footprints in the same layer of earth--wish I had saved it! There is a related issue with the Shroud of Turin: although it is from the time of Jesus, it was carbon dated to be from the Middle Ages. The reason given for this is that it was once housed in a building which caught fire, and the high temperature brought out chemicals (I forget the scientific jargon) that messed with the carbon dating. Perhaps some opposite effect is present in fossil-dating. Anyway, it's something I've been thinking about recently, but I guess I won't know for sure until I'm dead. Could be way off. Also, to add context to djmoforegon's post, I believe the cited reason for the Egyptians spreading the lies was so that they could "date" themselves further back than Scripture and thus claim to be gods.
Yes, and scripture itself speaks to the act of man being created "in the image and likeness of God" coming late in the creation "process". After having created the universe, cosmos, et al, God was "lonely" still and so He then created man out of His Love.....that, then, instilling within him/man, that certain "something" that made him especially different and above all the rest that went before and thus "immortal". Since God has "all the time in the world" even now to keep creating as He wishes, and no one knows how this continuation of His creative Spirit is still going forth within His infinity, why do we always have to limit Him to our own little marred way of envisioning Him, making Him sorta to our own limited imaginings and thus limiting even our own possibilities within His Divine Will??
It could very well be true that the first humans with souls were created six thousand years ago and not the earth. The major flaw in carbon dating is that it is based on many "assumptions" not cold, hard scientific proof. Here is an article that explains it better than I can. http://biblicalgeology.net/blog/fatal-flaw-radioactive-dating/ I still base my belief on the revelations given to Blessed Anne Catherine Emmerich. My husband has been questioning the validity of radioactive carbon dating since he was in college and a visiting Catholic physicist explained that the scientists on the board that defined carbon dating assigned an arbitrary number to the age of their base calculations of how old rocks were. This arbitrary number was so large that it excluded God, the Old Testament, and had no basis in science or truth.
Interesting ongoing projected schedule based on calculations with images....(Dec. 2016 or a little earlier!!?)
