2016 Presidential Election Thread

FP, almost 40 years ago I had an experience of the Lord which I recorded in a journal that very night. Well, according to my understanding it hasn't materialized as I thought, yet I still can't deny the experience. Maybe Charlie is in a similar place, though his "conversations" have been ongoing for a number of years. If what I experienced doesn't pan out, then I'll have an interesting discussion with the Lord when I hopefully gain Heaven. The big difference, of course, is that what Charlie has heard supposedly affects everyone, and he has gone public. Doing so attracts detractors as well as followers.

Anyway, I'll pray with you that the Prince of Peace will rule in all hearts this Christmas!

Safe in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary!

 

Question: I'm confused, is CJ's prophecy saying Obama will not be in office on January 20 to physically be present at the inauguration of Trump,? or, is he saying that things will commence which keep Obama in office and Trump is not inaugurated?

 

Elly,

Charlie's current position is that Obama will not finish his term and that there will be no inauguration for a new president. This will bring about emergency powers given temporarily to an individual to hold the reigns of power.

Safe in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary!

 

FP just wondering how familiar you are with CJ's work and if familiar can you take up Harpers challenge that I had also asked for earlier of providing a list of the prophecies foretold by Charlie that have come to pass. This is just for clarifications sake. He notes several times that he has been right on the sweep of things to date but what precisely is he referring to?

 

BETH B AND ALL OF US : BE OPTIMISTIC, BE JOYFUL IN ALL TIMES BECAUSE THE LORD IS PREPARING HIS RETURN !! FOCUS ON THAT !!
View attachment 5787

 

Charlie is a good guy. His writings are straight forward and very christian. They are easy to understand. It has a very neighborly feel. His problem is NOT that he speaks to God and angels on a daily basis. His problem is that he declared himself prophet. That CHANGES everything. If you declare yourself a prophet of God...then all bets are off. You have to completely change your life and all predictions have to be viewed with a fine tooth comb. Those of you that are trying to make excuses for him or create scenarios...so his prophecy is correct. Is not helping anyone. To declare yourself a prophet of God puts you at a WAY different level. Your action as well as your being have to completely change.

I see Charlie as a very good person who's ego allowed him declare himself prophet.


Brother al

 

Christianity Should Have Bigger Part in U.S. Schooling, Trump's Education Secretary Says

Yeepie !!!!!

http://www.christiantoday.com/artic...ng.trumps.education.secretary.says/102677.htm

 

Hi Elisa, I love this pic....praying you are right!!!!!!!!!

 

Our should destroy . Our eyes should be and not in order to feel .

Sorry, I am in a Christmas mood.... The above picture, I love it too, because this is what is really going to happen. That's why I long perhaps soo much for Christmas, it gives me the same feeling.
View attachment 5788

 

This put a smile on my face



View attachment 5789 Democrats Should Blame Planned Parenthood for Hillary Clinton Losing
On Election Day, Google Trends reported that the term “abortion” was the most-searched for all day. And look what happened. The candidate that embodied the most extreme agenda on abortion in history is now busy looking at cupcake recipes instead of whom to appoint as the next Supreme Court justice.

http://www.lifenews.com/2016/12/08/...lanned-parenthood-for-hillary-clinton-losing/

 

That Richards woman, in the photograph in the linked article, seems to my imagination to look vaguely reptilian. It is perhaps the long neck with all the wrinkles and that forced smile that would stop any clock. Those eyes, too, look so cold-in fairness, Clinton's don't. As we know, snakes are reptiles too. And we know who sometimes takes the form of a snake.

 

DeGaulle...you are a very perceptive man!

 

The Michigan Supreme Court refused to overturn a lower state court ruling to restart the recount. The Michigan recount is over. Dead. Buried. Over.

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/12/...ecount-until-almost-the-safe-harbor-deadline/

 

The Soros operatives are trying to create a constitutional crisis to prevent Trump from taking office:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/?icid=hjx004

 

.... and here is The Fat Lady, Kate Smith, singing a new song at the outbreak of WWII ... Dark Times then.... and now


GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!

 

I couldn't read the article that you posted but I found this one. http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...tion-hacks/ar-AAlmaAb?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=UE07DHP
Very sneaky way of going about this IMO. If something comes out which appears to have helped Trump win then this will just anger the Hillary fans even more, Obama should understand this. Very sad.
“We’re going to make public as much as we can”. Of course they are but only on this issue. Unbelievable.

 

It's just that Obama is so against Russia, he will try anything to start a war against them.

 

Obama hadn't the guts and wasn't stupid enough to blunder into confronting Russia. He chickened out over several lines in the sand in Syria, nor did he declare a no-fly zone. If he wanted war, he had several opportunities.
Clinton, on the other hand, had the necessary combination of hubris and incompetence required to start WWIII. The Times of London published a very thorough, comprehensive article last March on Clinton's record in Libya. This report, the antithesis of 'fake news', resurfaced late in the election campaign. It was absolutely damning. It depicted a woman whose sole motivation seemed to be to, at any cost, prove herself a tougher man than any man and yet who was so gullible as to be completely taken in by the promises of ignorant and hapless rebel groups. Her clueless arrogance was immortally demonstrated by her ridiculous comment on the killing of Qadafi, an act which left a tragic power vacuum: "We came, we saw, he died".

The world has suffered a narrow escape, it appears. I hope Trump doesn't prove me wrong!

 

I think that there's more to this story about Russia influencing the US elections than an attempt to prevent Trump's inauguration. A former British ambassador to the US threw cold water on the suggestion that Russia intervened to help Trump get elected. Nobody outside the US, even those pushing the influence angle, is suggesting that the story will change the result of the election. No matter who did the hacking, if the DNC and the Clinton campaign had nothing to hide it wouldn't have made any difference to the election. In fact, there's no proof that the emails did make a difference.

I suppose that blaming Russia takes the focus away from the contents of the emails but it's a bit ridiculous for the country that even hacked into Angela Merkel's phone to point fingers at other countries for hacking. It's also very bad form for the CIA to make such an allegation when they don't have actual proof that Russia is to blame. And even if it was the Russians, it's still bad form for them to attempt to undermine Trump's forthcoming presidency. Aside from their mistake about Saddam's WMD, were the CIA responsible for Obama declaring ISIS to be a JV team as they wreaked havoc in Iraq and Syria, including beheading US citizens? Perhaps they are afraid that Trump will make some personnel changes.

It looks like one of the aims is to censor social media and alternative news sources. I saw a discussion between journalists bemoaning the effect news sources other than themselves are having on "liberal democracies". Of course, it didn't occur to them that people turned to alternative sources because they woke up to the fact that the mainstream sources had abandoned straightforward reporting of news in favour of selectively spinning it with their own bias. There's talk of Russia launching a French speaking news channel and the hacks are terrified that they won't have sufficient influence to make sure that Holland's Socialist Party's candidate has a sniff at winning. While LePenn would be their default worst possible candidate, they see the Republican's candidate as only marginally better because he isn't sufficiently anti-Russia and socially "progressive" for their liking. All those who claim that Putin is a Communist should take note that these people range from pink to crimson in their political views. Freedom of religion to them means freedom to worship, and freedom of speech means freedom to say what they want to hear.