ANTONIO YAGüE ALERT: Warning Astro Visualized - CONFIRMED

Discussion in 'The mystical and Paranormal' started by Woman Clothed WithThe Sun, Nov 6, 2016.

  1. Seagrace

    Seagrace Archangels

    I agree with you, Daria. Any good activity can become a negative if it takes us away from our duties and responsibilities.
     
  2. Daria

    Daria Angels

    I think I got my answer about midnight (25.-26. November).
    Earlier in the evening I felt that I have to search some messages from a seer I respect. Then other searches followed and I found this: http://www.medugorje.com/2011/01/i-saw-two-suns-in-medugorje-in-1993/
    There is something special in this little article.... look at the comments, too, they are important. Father Finelli tells about his experience so modestly, and this is a important sign to me. I felt that this is my answer, but I don't know more at the moment. I just wait.
     
    andree and Jeanne like this.
  3. LittleVoice

    LittleVoice WOE WOE WOE

    I have long considered about this your post. You are maybe the closest to the date of the Warning. Another clue to the dates around 18th December are three months or three weeks between the Warning and the Miracle. Althought this fact was questioned, I believe in this fact. But why Mari Loli could not remember the right time (months or weeks)? Because she was maybe told about both months and weeks. Thus I consider about the third possibility: Three weeks and three months. 18th March is cca three weeks before the Miracle. 18th December is cca three months before 18th March.
    I am still in the time of vigilance and expect the Warning every hour, but you are maybe the first person, who guessed the date, or the interval of dates around Dec 18.
     
    DivineMercy and Serena like this.
  4. Carol55

    Carol55 Ave Maria

    LV, Thanks but that was merely a quick thought that I had, not a serious guess. Right after I posted that I wondered if it could be December 13th or ? or ? or ?. Like you said it may be anytime now. Funny though that you mention about 3 months and 3 weeks because that thought ran through my mind a few times also, but I think it is odd that no one else has stated anything about 3 months, 3 weeks except Thomas Fahy.

    PS - I also wondered some times if Mari Loli made an error about the Warning being in an even numbered year, I don't want to debate this with anyone, but I am being completely honest that it has occurred to me. In any case, heaven wants us to be vigilant to follow the message and try to be spiritually prepared for it to occur any time.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2016
    DivineMercy and LittleVoice like this.
  5. LittleVoice

    LittleVoice WOE WOE WOE

    13th December was also my hidden idea, because the Miracle shall be in 13th April. But I expect every day. The Astero of AY is still behind the sun, and nobody knows, if it shall crash into the sun or cause the Eclipse. The trajectory of Astero is other than we believed. Until two next weeks it should be again visible on the right side from the sun, and therefore we all will know only then, which of hypotheses is true. So if it will not crash into the sun until two weeks yet, we will know the approximate date.
     
  6. Carol55

    Carol55 Ave Maria

    I found one of the comments in Daria's link to be most interesting, the person said that the 2nd sun may be an indictor of the anti-Christ. Is the 2nd Sun an illusion that God will send us? I don't think that he would actually want us to have another sun especially if the sun represents him. Or is satan trying to mess up our divine messages by making these illusions appear so we think that is all that is meant by 2 suns, when God is actually speaking of the arrival of the anti-Christ?
    http://www.medugorje.com/2011/01/i-saw-two-suns-in-medugorje-in-1993/
    This also occurred to me when I read Notradamus' prophecy on the 2 suns, hmmm.
     
  7. Dean

    Dean Archangels

    Carol now that makes a whole lot more sense than a sin out there that no one sees which I find just silly. I've watched all the videos and not one is convincing.
     
    Carol55 likes this.
  8. Carol55

    Carol55 Ave Maria

    You mean sun, not sin, lol.
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2016
  9. LittleVoice

    LittleVoice WOE WOE WOE

    It was also my opinion. But this "astero object" has physical properties of natural object. The trajectory, the reflection of light etc. Look carloscalzada.com/x and you will see, that the unknown planet is moving behind the sun and reflecting the light circles now. It is real object and is certainly related with the Warning. We don't know the distance from sun and gravitational forces, so its behavior is for us still unknown.
     
    DivineMercy likes this.
  10. LittleVoice

    LittleVoice WOE WOE WOE

    All is possible... If it came in 2017, said Mari Loli untruth? No :D 2+0+1+7 =even number.
     
    any name you wish likes this.
  11. djmoforegon

    djmoforegon Powers

    Antonio Yague just posted this on his facebook page:

    Antonio Yague
    7 hrs ·
    I often send different people prophetic dreams relating to events of the past few days. This way of communicating with God, with men it is common in the scripture. Among other saint Joseph the husband of the virgin Mary was treated at key moments of his life in this way. Therefore, for everyone to analyze the details on the notice that others have received in this way, I've been wanting to do a compilation of the most significant in this article. I also added the testimony of people who have lived the interior lighting of the notice http://www.garabandal.org.es/index.php/noticias/suenos-profeticos-aviso

    · See original ·
    Rate this translation
    [​IMG]
    Sueños proféticos del Aviso
    Garabandal
    GARABANDAL.ORG.ES|BY SUPER USER
     
  12. Carol55

    Carol55 Ave Maria

    Thank you for posting this. Is there a translation to English? I must be doing something wrong.
     
  13. djmoforegon

    djmoforegon Powers

    No, not yet. Sometimes he posts a brief intro in English and then we just have to rely on Google translate. The link leads to his site on Garabandal....all in Spanish.
     
    Carol55 likes this.
  14. padraig

    padraig Powers

    I think a good way of looking at all legitamte Marian apparitions dwon the centuries is that of an ongoing conversatation of Our Lady /Heaven with her children on Earth. Medugorje is without the biggest and most impostant part of this conversation by light years. Because heaven has ionvested so much in these apparitions we can be sure of the huge urgency of our times. I also note how often we see symbols of the Book of Revelations involved. This being so ,as Pope St John Paul pointed out we can take it we have entered the time of Revelations.

    The movement of the sun is one of the keys to this.

    I know a few Catholics on the forum have been opposed to Medugorje but I have to say I consider that the alrege majority are supportive. Certainly I have only ever heard of a handful of people out of the many millions who travelled there who do not believe.
     
  15. CrewDog

    CrewDog Guest

    I don't think that many folks are "against" Medjugorje .... or Garabandal or ..... any other NOT Approved by the Church apparitions.... it's just that, if they are like me, they have a problem with those pushing the Not Approved as if they were gospel and chiseled in stone at the Vatican ... and some of these totally obsessed with the NOT Approved get hostile when folks like me point this out. Let us not forget that we have been burned, many times, in the past by the phony. Bayside is the most recent example I can think of. I believe that Scripture tells us to take what is good but keep our eyes focused on Christ and that which has been approved .... and tested these past 2000 years!

    GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!
     
  16. LittleVoice

    LittleVoice WOE WOE WOE

    I tell you, why God sent prophets and His Mother after the Pentecost. Because Christians are the same as were the Pharisees. Do they read and know the Gospel every day? Little. Do they understand the Gospel? At all. They read, know and understand the Gospel only literally. And those, who believe in new prophets, they also believe only literally. As the bones without meat (Ezekiel 37) they are.

    Do you understand the following sentences from the Gospel?
    So you are witnesses and you consent to the deeds of your fathers, for they killed them, and you build their tombs. Therefore also the Wisdom of God said, ‘I will send them prophets and apostles, some of whom they will kill and persecute,’ so that the blood of all the prophets, shed from the foundation of the world, may be charged against this generation, from the blood of Abel to the blood of Zechariah, who perished between the altar and the sanctuary. Yes, I tell you, it will be required of this generation. Woe to you lawyers! For you have taken away the key of knowledge. You did not enter yourselves, and you hindered those who were entering.”

    You should meditate about the Spirit of these sentences. :)
     
  17. Harper

    Harper Guest

    Not approved = "strong caution" from archbishop? Banned from speaking at Catholic venues at home?

    People get hostile towards you, CrewDog, when you point out someone is "Not Approved"?

    Tell us more about your being burned "by the phony"...:whistle:
     
  18. CrewDog

    CrewDog Guest

    The only one here HOSTILE in this thread is you Ms. Harper and your Jihad Jane Op. I have only stated that I believe Charlie is credible .... and Charlie has credible Bishop(s), Priests and Lay People who believe he is credible also. We will all know how credible Charlie is in 50 days or so. ... and, perhaps, how NOT credible you are :LOL:

    GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!
     
    Patty likes this.
  19. Harper

    Harper Guest

    CrewDog,

    You made statements. I asked for clarifications. You claim to be a victim of hostility. You claim to be skeptical of some "NOT APPROVED." Well, who? When? Where? How?

    If you are going to frame yourself as tolerant offer some evidence, because it is not obvious. Use facts, not insults. You not only stated you believe Charlie is credible, you also viciously attacked anyone who dared hint otherwise. Not just me.

    You have never been able to answer any reasonable questions posed about Charlie Johnston. Not one. You have never answered or referred to the standards applied by the Church to counter facts showing many real issues with Charlie's behavior. (Confessions held in violation of canon law? "Full service aggressive dating?" "Kick 'em in the crotch"? "Stopped a bank robbery...rescued a family from a burning car...drank poisoned water and survived!")

    Don't end your posts with "GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!" when you intend to slander others.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 30, 2016
  20. CrewDog

    CrewDog Guest

    I have slandered NO ONE Ms. Harper!! You are the one with this Very Strange and Odd Obsession with Charlie Johnston ... Not Me!!
    It is not my job to feed your obsession!!! ..... Get a Life!!

    GOD SAVE ALL HERE!!
     

Share This Page