It's the problem of the 'slippy slope', if I could put it that way. Just last week we had on the mainstream news in Ireland a bulletin about 'further evidence for the existence extra-terrestrial life. Researchers studied with the James Webb telescope a so-called exoplanet circulating around a distant star in our own galaxy - 124 light years away. They found incontrovertible spectroscopic evidence of a chemical called dimethyl sulphide on this planet (K2 18b) - a chemical which can only be produced by living micro-organisms here on earth. Once you accept the concept of extra-terrestrial life, you start thinking of 'intelligent non-human life'. The UFOs and other deceptions all feed into this. And that then opens up a vista of 'God's revelation to such creatures'. Before you know it, you are thinking (God forbid!) in terms of 'multiple redemptions / mutiple incarnations of Christ' ... I have no doubt that any of these so-called 'aliens' manifestations are demonic entities. May God and His Holy Mother protect us from any such coming deceptions!
Praise from the devil. A fitting epitaph? "Freedom, equality and fraternity" is perhaps satan's greatest lie, all the more because it is that species of most deadly lie, the half-truth, which can so easily deceive. And has. "Equality" and "Freedom" contradict one another and if we're all equal, there is no freedom. As for 'fraternity', that hasn't worked out very well.
Given the prevalence of reports that a huge proportion of scientific papers are now quite bogus, or at best weighted to emphasise the desired result, particularly if it means providing an opportunity for more research funding, I'd be sceptical. Also, dimethyl sulphide seems a very basic molecule to assume that life is the only possible physico-chemical scenario for it to appear. Maybe so on Earth, but in other conditions? Now, if it was a complicated amino acid... We're not getting any reports in the mainstream media of the consternation that has accompanied the Webb telescope. The 'experts', with their theories of an evolving universe expected the most distant, and therefore supposedly oldest, galaxies to appear as raw, primitive proto-galaxies and loose nebulae of gas. Instead, they are mature and organised in appearance, no different to the nearer, and therefore 'newer' galaxies. This discovery fundamentally upends all their assumptions, but it's been well covered-up. Chateaubriand, the great French anti-Enlightenment philosopher proposed that God created the Universe with the appearance of a long history, much as a novelist creates characters complete with a past, but without actually acting it out in novel time. The appearance of these galaxies, so far away, so supposedly old, but in appearance so recent, confounds the astronomical evolutionists (who will, no doubt, concoct some new hypotheses to evade the problem), but seems not so different from the descriptions of Genesis and the proposal of Chateaubriand.
More prayers for the soul of Papa Frankie. I do hope the poor man made it through the Golden Gates. There are strong rumours going round the internet that he refused the Last Rites. Of course I don't think anyone could know. Still to be honest I would not be surprised but I hope it is not so. Prayers. I have this huge sense of something tremendous coming that will totally surprise everyone.
Arcivescovo Carlo Maria Viganò 1. Your Excellency, what is your evaluation of Pope Bergoglio? In recent decades, a subversive lobby has taken over the levers of power in governments and institutions, in order to carry out the anti-Christian and Masonic plan of the Revolution. Government agencies – as we know from what is also emerging in the United States of America – have interfered in the life of various nations, organizing and financing the so-called “Agenda 2030” of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum, which consists in the destruction of the family, the commodification of human life, the moral corruption of children and young people, the exploitation of workers, and the privatization of all those services that until the 1990s were guaranteed – without a motive of profit – by the State: health, infrastructure, defense, communications, education. To carry out this global coup, the collaboration (paid, of course) of corrupt government officials, and of corrupt politicians, doctors, judges, and teachers was necessary. The Catholic Church, which with the Second Vatican Council had already aligned itself with the worldly mentality, had however remained firmly anchored to certain non-negotiable principles, for example in matters of sexual morality or respect for human life from conception to natural death. Benedict XVI was clearly opposed to the globalist plan and would never have derogated from these principles by legitimizing the LGBTQ ideology, gender ideology, the pseudo-health follies of the WHO in matters of genetic modification and world depopulation, or the Islamization of Europe through ethnic substitution. It was therefore necessary to eliminate Joseph Ratzinger, replacing him with a “pope” who – as Hillary Clinton’s collaborator, John Podesta, hoped – would promote the Agenda 2030, ratify climate change fraud, and convince the faithful around the world to undergo the inoculation of a serum that we now know was designed to eliminate or pathologize most of humanity. This Vatican coup was made possible (and we know this from the admissions of its protagonists, including the controversial Cardinal Danneels) by the maneuvers of the Saint Gallen Mafia, which in concert with the American deep state pushed Benedict XVI to resign and managed to appoint Jorge Mario Bergoglio to the highest position in the Catholic Church. Bergoglio’s was a usurpation no more and no less than those that allowed the globalist lobby to impose government leaders under the orders of the Davos Forum in the Italy of Conte and Draghi, the France of Macron, the England of Johnson and Starmer, the Spain of Sanchez, the Ireland of Martin, the Canada of Trudeau, the Australia of Arden, the United States first of the Clintons and Obama and then of Biden, and in the European Union of von der Leyen. All of these leaders did not come to power legitimately, but rather through scheming, electoral fraud, or manipulation of consensus; and they exercise this power against the citizens and against the institutions that they should represent. And all of these people, without exception, are widely compromised and subject to blackmail, so they are forced to obey if they do not want to see their crimes and perversions brought to light. And neither Bergoglio nor his acolytes are an exception in this regard. The judgment that any Catholic is led to formulate on this “papacy” – which was not really a Papacy at all but only seemed to be such – cannot but be terrible, from every point of view. The Church of Rome, after these twelve years of tyranny, is devastated by scandals, corruption, violations of human rights – I am thinking of the Agreement with the communist dictatorship of Beijing – and by a failed management on all fronts. The timid criticisms of some Cardinals and Bishops of Bergoglio’s heresies and scandals have in no way dented this global regime that sees the worlds’ rulers as its allies – opposed to the good of both citizens and believers. https://x.com/CarloMVigano/status/1915332649138237627
I feel the same way. This lent was very different for me. Instead of giving something up I did a Holy Face Novena everyday. We have some big storms ahead in our church. We really need to stay focused and not give up as Our Blessed Mother has requested. Don’t give up the ship!
Well I am not too taken with Vigano. I never liked him breaking the Papal Oath of Secrecy. If you are not going to keep a Sacred Oath don't take it. But he is right on the money with this.
Currently most speculators are betting that conclave wont take more than 4 days. Which will begin 9 days after Saturday if I am correct. https://polymarket.com/event/days-to-elect-the-next-pope I am positive that the cardinals in general already know what Vigano has said is true, and much much more. Many joke currently if the next Pope will be Catholic. For me this is inaccurate, this conclave will be about electing a Pope who right the ship or one who will continue on with the current modus operandi. Should a Pope be elected who will right the ship, it will be a very good but painful time for the church in general. As what many denied as merely conspiracy theories will then be given validity by church authority.
Well apparently if you bet on the next Pope, according to Canon Law you get automatically excommunicated. Which is a pity as I'd love to have a bet. Oh wait! You can bet! In 1591, Pope Gregory XIV forbade all betting on the election of the pope, under penalty of excommunication. That law, however, was abrogated in 1918, which means there is currently no canon law on the subject, per Edward Peters, a professor of canon law at Sacred Heart seminary in Detroit. https://www.axios.com/2025/04/22/pope-francis-death-market-bets
Here are Paddy Powers betting odds: https://news.paddypower.com/politic...urites-succeed-francis-vatican-25-april-2025/
Here is the current speculation from polymarket. Of the top six spots four have the name Peter, which indicates the prophecy of St. Malachy could be playing out or at least that people believe it is. https://polymarket.com/event/who-will-be-the-next-pope?tid=1745503501975
The reputable German Catholic (yes, there are still some) journalist, Paul Badde, is a renowned authority on the Holy Face of Manopello and, according to a book of his on the subject, Cardinal Tagle of the Phillipines is a devotee. He is regarded as very much a liberal, but at least he might be a Catholic, on that evidence.
We know he received the Last Rites when he was so ill in the hospital. At least that was what was reported.
Pope Francis would have received the Apostolic pardon with the Sacrament of Extreme Unction so there's a good chance that he's already in Heaven. If not, may God have mercy on him and fast track him through Purgatory. He was far from my favourite Pope but since I heard that he 'phoned the parish in Gaza every day, even from his sick bed, I reckon that he may well have been chosen by the Holy Spirit because those 'phone calls probably saved that church and the people sheltering in it from being bombed to smithereens. I also heard that the Zionists are calling him anti-Semitic. I don't care who praises him, the fact that those monsters are bad mouthing him is good enough for me because Satan knows his enemy and they have proven themselves to be Satan's foot soldiers. If Pope Francis is already in Heaven I'm sure that he will be interceding for the safety of the people in the Holy Family parish. If they manage to survive until the conclave, I hope that the new Pope will continue the daily contact. Just in case Francis isn't quite through the pearly gates, I'll be praying for Our Lady to wrap her blue mantle around that church.
There are some incredible allegations against a Cardinal Law and the "criminal faction of Jesuits" in this testimony. Not for those who don't want to be upset by horrible information. Not that anyone likes to be upset. I really don't know how to word a caveat for this. But this testimony really really explains a lot. It points once again to the CIA. https://x.com/RealAlexJones/status/1915215507432649195 "While no longer Archbishop of Boston, Law remained a bishop and cardinal of the Catholic Church in good standing; as a cardinal, he participated in the 2005 papal conclave.[24] " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Francis_Law Evidently, they keep bad cardinals around for votes.
