It’s hard not to be convinced that there were two Sister Ls when you read the evidence and look at the photos. And so plausible to think that the second Sister L was wheeled out on public occasions whilst the first remained hidden away so she could be silenced. Could the powers of the Vatican have convinced the relatives that Sister L was safer away from the spotlight? And told that to satisfy the public, number 2 would be paraded about? So difficult to believe that no one blurted this out. But it is easy to believe that some would use any tactics they could to change the narrative and confuse us. I’ve been to Fatima. It was a joy to be there.
This is an interesting video on the subject. It gives additional information and suggests that the alleged substitution took place in 1958-1959, after the real Sister Lucia died or was killed. The Vatican feared that once she became aware that the third secret would not be released she would become a liability and so had to be silenced somehow.
If there is any truth in this subject, then it should put new light on any apparition or prophet (seer) around which there is a battle going on. I am thinking of Amsterdam and others that I won't name because of the trigger effect. Am also wondering about other apparitions where there are secrets and why the seers who are supposed to announce things are still alive and well! I said I would not speculate but apparently I can't help myself
Here’s Malachi Martins endorsement of the fake Sister Lucia’s theory and other topics. Fascinating stuff.
I was going to say that the impostor theory needed to be placed in the context of Malachi Martin's comments on how Sr. Lucy had been treated by the Vatican. Intriguing indeed.
Hi Blizzard, My detective skills are totally slacking today, lol. I watched this video and although I thought my hearing was good I missed where MM confirms that he believes that there was a fake Sister Lucy. Can you tell me the exact 2 parts of the video which state this? Thank you. Sorry about that.
I have never believed new sister l to be the real one. Just from the pictures, her chin, dimples and mannerisms. The truth will be out soon I know it
This is all so bizarre. They present a lot of evidence, but it is still very hard to swallow. The imposter would have lived a lie as a Carmelite, and her superiors and family would have been in on it. I did not watch all of the videos posted here, but was Sr. Lucia 's body ever exhumed to determine if her body was incorrupt? Without DNA testing this will remain a mystery.
You are the voice of common sense. It's completely preposterous. I totally disbelieve this lie. Aviso (Alban) says Sr. Lucy's family denies this, as well. He denies this as well.
Having read alot of spy type novels over the years, and only playing devil's advocate in saying this - IF there was a 2nd Sister, is it not possible that both could have been in the same convent at the same time, both real sisters? One being unaware of the other? Just living her life in peace. So, when family would visit they would actually visit with their relative? Crazy speculation, I know. They say truth is stranger than fiction. God bless Sister's family. I couldn't even imagine their sufferings over the years dealing with all this.
I agree with you Lois that Sister's family must be suffering, they deserve our prayers. How hard it must have been for Sr. Lucia to have been the guardian of those secrets from childhood. I am confident that Sr.Lucia is in her heavenly home with St. Jacinta, and St. Francisco.
