We don't know. Maybe Florida was just an example of a state for the audience in question. Like I said, I've been listening again to his many radio interviews, and I'm reminded of an instance where he answered someone's question on wether or not the US was mentioned in the secret; he said that not by name, but something relevant to the US was in it.
maybe there was mention of a nation annihilated in the third secret (in a mysterious language like Babylon for example) and he interpreted it as the USA?
Doesn't seem to be consistent with the precision of the Blessed Virgin Mary in this particular message, since she mentioned specific countries and cities in the secret. Malachi Martin said that the message of the third secret is very precise, direct and straightforward (which goes against what the Vatican published in more ways than one). My guess is that a state of the US is mentioned.
Father Malachi talks about the possibility of an antipope appearing in the future from 15:13 of the video (approximately), this video has the option to activate and translate the subtitles (which most of the time brings a poor translation) but in the case of this video I was able to understand well the words of Father Malachi.
Maybe he really meant California. Maybe an earthquake will break it off from the mainland along the fault line.
Yes, it's heavily implied that a pope under the control of Satan, an antipope, is part of the secret. He reiterated that again in one of his interviews with Art Bell. His foresight of a papal resignation to make way for an antipope (Windswept House) is also interesting.
Thank you AED! I knew I had read in the past about Pope’s in La Salette. But Melanie also mentioned a Bishop. I’m pretty sure. I just can’t find it.
“Control of Satan” may not necessarily mean the Pope will be possessed. It may mean that Satan through his Mason’s control a Pope.
Fr Hesse (who has gone to be with the Lord) spoke of this in a talk on you tube. Not sure it is still there. I believe Malachi Martin made reference to it as well.
Based on recent developments especially this year, yes, the Warning could occur as early as this fall, but it's also worth noting that we are in the midst of a synod as we speak. My neighborhood church is certainly promoting it....
You are so right. And what I’ve been hearing from some priests is that Pope Francis will agree with the German synod on homosexuality.
https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/...nces-for-death-of-cardinal-angelo-sodano.html I posted this news here, because Cardinal Sodano was responsible for revealing in 2000 the text of the third secret that contains the martyrdom of a Pope, so there has been a lot of controversy since then whether he helped to hide any part of the message.
I haven’t seen the entire video, but I am familiar with some of the key details….The stigmatist in question would have to be Antonio Ruffini who allegedly told Fr. Kramer in response to the question, will Pope JP II be the one to consecrate Russia? This conversation supposedly took place during the 1990s and it had circulated among certain followers of Fatima since then, but not with controversy. One “Catholic” blogger actually ridiculed Fr. Kramer about this since the latter allegedly had made predictions that supposedly had not come to pass….What Ruffini supposedly said was “no,” and neither would it be his “successor,” but the one who comes after. Yet, there would be no need to mention that the one following JP II would still be alive in time to see his replacement because that bit of detail doesn’t necessarily add anything relevant to the answer.
My personal takeaway, isn’t that Frs. Kramer and Gruner were “confused,” but rather, they were attempting to integrate key elements of Garabandal in a tactful manner without mentioning it directly, and to properly understand this point would require a considerable familiarity with the Art Bell interviews of Malachi Martin and how the latter is able to establish a crucial link between Garabandal and Fatima. Incidentally, I have read that Fr. Kramer is a strong critic of Pope Francis to the point of questioning the validity of his pontificate, but I don’t know if that position holds true to this day…..
Listen to this video. Bishop Sheen says the false prophet comes from one of our Bishops. I think Fr Kramer is on to something. If there is an anti Pope coming, he may come after Pope Francis.
